主题
本指南展示如何使用递归检索遍历节点关系,并基于“引用”获取节点。
节点引用是一个强大的概念。在首次执行检索时,你可能希望检索引用而不是原始文本。你可以让多个引用指向同一个节点。
在本指南中,我们探索节点引用的一些不同用法:
- 分块引用:不同分块大小引用一个更大的分块
- 元数据引用:摘要 + 生成的问题引用一个更大的分块
我们使用 Braintrust 评估递归检索 + 节点引用方法的效果。Braintrust 是用于构建 AI 产品的企业级技术栈。从评估到提示词测试场,再到数据管理,我们帮你消除将 AI 引入业务时的不确定性和繁琐工作。
你可以在此处查看以下项目的示例评估仪表板:
%pip install llama-index-llms-openai
%pip install llama-index-readers-file%load_ext autoreload
%autoreload 2
# NOTE: Replace YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY with your OpenAI API Key and YOUR_BRAINTRUST_API_KEY with your BrainTrust API key. Do not put it in quotes.
# Signup for Braintrust at https://braintrustdata.com/ and get your API key at https://www.braintrustdata.com/app/braintrustdata.com/settings/api-keys
# NOTE: Replace YOUR_OPENAI_KEY with your OpenAI API Key and YOUR_BRAINTRUST_API_KEY with your BrainTrust API key. Do not put it in quotes.
%env OPENAI_API_KEY=
%env BRAINTRUST_API_KEY=
%env TOKENIZERS_PARALLELISM=true # This is needed to avoid a warning message from Chroma%pip install -U llama_hub llama_index braintrust autoevals pypdf pillow transformers torch torchvision加载数据 + 设置
在本节中,我们下载 Llama 2 论文,并创建一组初始节点(分块大小 1024)。
!mkdir data
!wget --user-agent "Mozilla" "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.09288.pdf" -O "data/llama2.pdf"from pathlib import Path
from llama_index.readers.file import PDFReader
from llama_index.core.response.notebook_utils import display_source_node
from llama_index.core.retrievers import RecursiveRetriever
from llama_index.core.query_engine import RetrieverQueryEngine
from llama_index.core import VectorStoreIndex
from llama_index.llms.openai import OpenAI
import jsonloader = PDFReader()
docs0 = loader.load_data(file=Path("./data/llama2.pdf"))from llama_index.core import Document
doc_text = "\n\n".join([d.get_content() for d in docs0])
docs = [Document(text=doc_text)]from llama_index.core.node_parser import SentenceSplitter
from llama_index.core.schema import IndexNodenode_parser = SentenceSplitter(chunk_size=1024)base_nodes = node_parser.get_nodes_from_documents(docs)
# set node ids to be a constant
for idx, node in enumerate(base_nodes):
node.id_ = f"node-{idx}"from llama_index.core.embeddings import resolve_embed_model
embed_model = resolve_embed_model("local:BAAI/bge-small-en")
llm = OpenAI(model="gpt-3.5-turbo")基线检索器
定义一个基线检索器,它仅按嵌入相似度获取前 k 个原始文本节点。
base_index = VectorStoreIndex(base_nodes, embed_model=embed_model)
base_retriever = base_index.as_retriever(similarity_top_k=2)retrievals = base_retriever.retrieve(
"Can you tell me about the key concepts for safety finetuning"
)for n in retrievals:
display_source_node(n, source_length=1500)query_engine_base = RetrieverQueryEngine.from_args(base_retriever, llm=llm)response = query_engine_base.query(
"Can you tell me about the key concepts for safety finetuning"
)
print(str(response))分块引用:较小的子分块引用更大的父分块
在此用法示例中,我们展示如何构建一个由较小分块指向较大父分块的图。
在查询时,我们检索较小的分块,但会跟随引用找到较大的分块。这使我们能够获得更多上下文以进行综合。
sub_chunk_sizes = [128, 256, 512]
sub_node_parsers = [SentenceSplitter(chunk_size=c) for c in sub_chunk_sizes]
all_nodes = []
for base_node in base_nodes:
for n in sub_node_parsers:
sub_nodes = n.get_nodes_from_documents([base_node])
sub_inodes = [
IndexNode.from_text_node(sn, base_node.node_id) for sn in sub_nodes
]
all_nodes.extend(sub_inodes)
# also add original node to node
original_node = IndexNode.from_text_node(base_node, base_node.node_id)
all_nodes.append(original_node)all_nodes_dict = {n.node_id: n for n in all_nodes}vector_index_chunk = VectorStoreIndex(all_nodes, embed_model=embed_model)vector_retriever_chunk = vector_index_chunk.as_retriever(similarity_top_k=2)retriever_chunk = RecursiveRetriever(
"vector",
retriever_dict={"vector": vector_retriever_chunk},
node_dict=all_nodes_dict,
verbose=True,
)nodes = retriever_chunk.retrieve(
"Can you tell me about the key concepts for safety finetuning"
)
for node in nodes:
display_source_node(node, source_length=2000)query_engine_chunk = RetrieverQueryEngine.from_args(retriever_chunk, llm=llm)response = query_engine_chunk.query(
"Can you tell me about the key concepts for safety finetuning"
)
print(str(response))元数据引用:摘要 + 生成的问题引用更大的分块
在此用法示例中,我们展示如何定义引用源节点的额外上下文。
这些额外上下文包括摘要以及生成的问题。
在查询时,我们检索较小的分块,但会跟随引用找到较大的分块。这使我们能够获得更多上下文以进行综合。
from llama_index.core.node_parser import SentenceSplitter
from llama_index.core.schema import IndexNode
from llama_index.core.extractors import (
SummaryExtractor,
QuestionsAnsweredExtractor,
)extractors = [
SummaryExtractor(summaries=["self"], show_progress=True),
QuestionsAnsweredExtractor(questions=5, show_progress=True),
]# run metadata extractor across base nodes, get back dictionaries
metadata_dicts = []
for extractor in extractors:
metadata_dicts.extend(extractor.extract(base_nodes))# cache metadata dicts
def save_metadata_dicts(path):
with open(path, "w") as fp:
for m in metadata_dicts:
fp.write(json.dumps(m) + "\n")
def load_metadata_dicts(path):
with open(path, "r") as fp:
metadata_dicts = [json.loads(l) for l in fp.readlines()]
return metadata_dictssave_metadata_dicts("data/llama2_metadata_dicts.jsonl")metadata_dicts = load_metadata_dicts("data/llama2_metadata_dicts.jsonl")# all nodes consists of source nodes, along with metadata
import copy
all_nodes = copy.deepcopy(base_nodes)
for idx, d in enumerate(metadata_dicts):
inode_q = IndexNode(
text=d["questions_this_excerpt_can_answer"],
index_id=base_nodes[idx].node_id,
)
inode_s = IndexNode(
text=d["section_summary"], index_id=base_nodes[idx].node_id
)
all_nodes.extend([inode_q, inode_s])all_nodes_dict = {n.node_id: n for n in all_nodes}## Load index into vector index
from llama_index.core import VectorStoreIndex
from llama_index.llms.openai import OpenAI
llm = OpenAI(model="gpt-3.5-turbo")
vector_index_metadata = VectorStoreIndex(all_nodes)vector_retriever_metadata = vector_index_metadata.as_retriever(
similarity_top_k=2
)retriever_metadata = RecursiveRetriever(
"vector",
retriever_dict={"vector": vector_retriever_metadata},
node_dict=all_nodes_dict,
verbose=True,
)nodes = retriever_metadata.retrieve(
"Can you tell me about the key concepts for safety finetuning"
)
for node in nodes:
display_source_node(node, source_length=2000)query_engine_metadata = RetrieverQueryEngine.from_args(
retriever_metadata, llm=llm
)response = query_engine_metadata.query(
"Can you tell me about the key concepts for safety finetuning"
)
print(str(response))评估
我们使用 Braintrust 评估递归检索 + 节点引用方法的效果。Braintrust 是用于构建 AI 产品的企业级技术栈。从评估到提示词测试场,再到数据管理,我们帮你消除将 AI 引入业务时的不确定性和繁琐工作。
我们同时评估分块引用和元数据引用。我们使用嵌入相似度查找来检索引用节点。我们将两种方法与直接获取原始节点的基线检索器进行比较。在指标方面,我们使用命中率和 MRR 进行评估。
你可以在此处查看以下项目的示例评估仪表板:
数据集生成
我们首先从文本分块集合中生成一个问答数据集。
from llama_index.core.evaluation import (
generate_question_context_pairs,
EmbeddingQAFinetuneDataset,
)
import nest_asyncio
nest_asyncio.apply()eval_dataset = generate_question_context_pairs(base_nodes)eval_dataset.save_json("data/llama2_eval_dataset.json")# optional
eval_dataset = EmbeddingQAFinetuneDataset.from_json(
"data/llama2_eval_dataset.json"
)比较结果
我们对每个检索器运行评估,以衡量命中率和 MRR。
我们发现,使用节点引用(分块引用或元数据引用)的检索器往往比直接检索原始分块表现更好。
import pandas as pd
# set vector retriever similarity top k to higher
top_k = 10
def display_results(names, results_arr):
"""Display results from evaluate."""
hit_rates = []
mrrs = []
for name, eval_results in zip(names, results_arr):
metric_dicts = []
for eval_result in eval_results:
metric_dict = eval_result.metric_vals_dict
metric_dicts.append(metric_dict)
results_df = pd.DataFrame(metric_dicts)
hit_rate = results_df["hit_rate"].mean()
mrr = results_df["mrr"].mean()
hit_rates.append(hit_rate)
mrrs.append(mrr)
final_df = pd.DataFrame(
{"retrievers": names, "hit_rate": hit_rates, "mrr": mrrs}
)
display(final_df)让我们定义一些评分函数,并定义我们的数据集 data 变量。
queries = eval_dataset.queries
relevant_docs = eval_dataset.relevant_docs
data = [
({"input": queries[query], "expected": relevant_docs[query]})
for query in queries.keys()
]
def hitRateScorer(input, expected, output=None):
is_hit = any([id in expected for id in output])
return 1 if is_hit else 0
def mrrScorer(input, expected, output=None):
for i, id in enumerate(output):
if id in expected:
return 1 / (i + 1)
return 0import braintrust
# Evaluate the chunk retriever
vector_retriever_chunk = vector_index_chunk.as_retriever(similarity_top_k=10)
retriever_chunk = RecursiveRetriever(
"vector",
retriever_dict={"vector": vector_retriever_chunk},
node_dict=all_nodes_dict,
verbose=False,
)
def runChunkRetriever(input, hooks):
retrieved_nodes = retriever_chunk.retrieve(input)
retrieved_ids = [node.node.node_id for node in retrieved_nodes]
return retrieved_ids
chunkEval = await braintrust.Eval(
name="llamaindex-recurisve-retrievers",
data=data,
task=runChunkRetriever,
scores=[hitRateScorer, mrrScorer],
)# Evaluate the metadata retriever
vector_retriever_metadata = vector_index_metadata.as_retriever(
similarity_top_k=10
)
retriever_metadata = RecursiveRetriever(
"vector",
retriever_dict={"vector": vector_retriever_metadata},
node_dict=all_nodes_dict,
verbose=False,
)
def runMetaDataRetriever(input, hooks):
retrieved_nodes = retriever_metadata.retrieve(input)
retrieved_ids = [node.node.node_id for node in retrieved_nodes]
return retrieved_ids
metadataEval = await braintrust.Eval(
name="llamaindex-recurisve-retrievers",
data=data,
task=runMetaDataRetriever,
scores=[hitRateScorer, mrrScorer],
)# Evaluate the base retriever
base_retriever = base_index.as_retriever(similarity_top_k=10)
def runBaseRetriever(input, hooks):
retrieved_nodes = base_retriever.retrieve(input)
retrieved_ids = [node.node.node_id for node in retrieved_nodes]
return retrieved_ids
baseEval = await braintrust.Eval(
name="llamaindex-recurisve-retrievers",
data=data,
task=runBaseRetriever,
scores=[hitRateScorer, mrrScorer],
)